More Pages: Hamilton Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79


It was terrible!
Wonderful!
Delightful!

My other title for this book: To Kill an Elephant
Captivating and wonderful! What a battle

Good Read!
Excellent Harlequin

good read but i wouldnt read it again!
A bland sort of readingJethro was helping his nanny's husband by washing windows. The nanny's huband has a business of washing windows and he became sick so Jethro comes in to help him. When Allie sees what's he doing, she assumes that Jethro is poor. She proposes a marriage to Jethro because she's in need of a husband to help her out. In return, he'll get a big check if he agrees. She thinks he'll accept because he's poor, when in actuality he's terribly rich but Jethro marries her, anyway, because he's in love with her. From that point on, it's really a matter of thought.
I chose to read this book because the plot seemed interesting and intense. It wasn't. The timing that made everything worthwhile was off and there weren't enough descriptions in the story to make the characters real. Although I do admire Allie's loyalty to her mom but this book is one of the type where you can read on and off and not care.


nice story
A mysterious beautiful woman asks Gus Pike for help...
Gail Hamilton writes the novelization of her own "Avonlea" teleplay or "A Dark and Stormy Night," which was notable for the performance of Christopher Reeve as the dark and dangerous Robert Rutherford. Although the adventure is not actually based on anything Lucy Maud Montgomery wrote about in "The Story Girl" and "Chronicles of Avonlea" volumes, at the heart of the episode is the budding romance between Felicity and Gus. It was made quite clear in "The Golden Road" that the high and mighty Felicity King was not going to marry some handsome, rich stranger, but the lowly stable boy she so disdained. On "Avonlea" the original stable boy is replaced by the character of Gus Pike and the fun of this particular story is how Felicity is too proud to admit to any feelings for Gus whatsoever. Of course, what is going on is perfectly plain to Sara. So while Miss Stone and Mr. Rutherford engage in their theatrical feud, it is this early chapter on the road to love that is going to strike a chord with young readers. I know wanting to see Felicity finally admit her feelings to Gus was why I kept subscribing to Disney, just to watch this series.


Terrific source of technical reference, otherwise marginal
Gripping and comprehensive with careful attention to detail.

Not as good as the show!
The return of Roger King turns the King farm upside downIt is also interesting to me that while the first dozen "Road to Avonlea" novelizations focused primarily on Sara Stanley and her young King cousins, the second dozen is focusing much more on the adults. Certainly an interesting choice for a series that you would have presumed was geared towards young readers, in which case the romantic side of Hetty King is not necessarily all that big of an attraction. The "Family Rivalry" storybook is written by Gail Hamilton from Jerome McCann's script for the "Avonlea" series. Although this is not one of the better episodes focusing on my favorite character, Alec King, it is nice to see him be the focus on a story.


Nice package, but might contain errors?After reading the book however, I became quite concerned
because I noticed immediately that the author (intentionally or unintentionally) changed many of the words in the The Federalist!! This annoys me to no end. It's extremely bad practice for purposes of history, to change words in historical documents, because those "translated" words might accidentally get passed to future generations without aknowledgement that that wasn't what the founding fathers actualy wrote. I noticed at least a dozen changed words... there are probably thousands of errors for all I know.. This is bad, bad, bad.
Heres an example from Federalist Paper #1: (pg. 3)
This book writes: "After a full experience of the insufficiency of the existing federal government, you are invited to deliberate upon a new Constitution for the United States of America..."
Every other book in existence writes: "AFTER an unequivocal experience of the inefficacy of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution for the United States of America...."
Notice the subtle, yet immensely importance difference in words.
Now what gives this dumb author the right as a scholarly academian to change the words of our founding fathers. In fact, I don't even know which version is truly correct?? (I assume the majority rules, so this book comes out the loser.)
And these errors continue right through Federalist paper #1, and several others that I noticed... Maybe even all of them!
Also, the author has a nasty habit of decapitalising words which should be capitalized in historical conext. Our founding fathers, as was customary grammar at the time, capitalized many words in the middle of the sentance. I don't fully understand the details of antiquated English, however, when I buy a book on historical figures, I expect, nay, I demand, that the reproduction be produced in exactly the manner in which it was presented by our founding fathers. It can be difficult to understand antiquated English, especially some of the stuff written by James Madison, however, I'd rather do the mental translation myself.
It's a nice book, but I cannot in good conscience give this
anything above 2 stars. In fact, I think it deserves no stars.
NOTE: After researching the matter a little bit, it occurs to me that there are actually two common distinct "translations" and this book presents just one of them.... so I take back blaming the editor. I'm not sure of the origin of these modern translations... but it does seem that this version is much less popular than what is presented in other Federalist Paper repros.
I still claim that this version is error.
A Wonderful Edition of American Political HistoryThis Modern Library edition has several features which sets it apart from other editions. First, the editor's introduction (by Robert Scigliano of Boston College) is quite informative and helpful for those who are just getting started in their study and research of American history. And yet it is detailed enough to be informative for those who have a stronger background in American Revolutionary history. Second, the appendices include The Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the U.S. along with the amendments. Third, the book has a short but nice bibliography, as well as a nice and very useful index. All these features helped to set this particular edition apart from other editions that I have owned or read.
Of course, the Federalist writings are some of the key writings in American Revolutionary history. Every American should be required to read them since they were written with the intent of promoting the ratification of the constitution. These writings contain the ideas and development of the American system of government, the separation of powers, how congress is to be organized, and the positions of the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government. This work provides its reader with the thoughts, inspirations, and brilliance behind the American Constitution and development of American government.
I highly recommend this edition of the Federalists.


The cover and byline are more than the novel provides.
If you want some entertaining but predictable reading, and can pick it up cheap, then do it.
The artwork on the cover is an early work of now world renowned cover artist Thomas Kidd.
Buy this if you can.

Author in love with his style, not the story
Irreverent AccountThe expedition members, based in the U.K., chartered a Russian ship, the Keldysh, which is the mothership to a pair of deep-sea manned submersibles that can dive to deeper depths than virtually any other craft on the planet. (This ship was involved in dives on the wrecks of the Titanic and Bismarck.) Unfortunately for Orca, the salvage expedition, the Keldysh is a research vessel, and it was only because the Russians were strapped for cash that they were willing to lease out their ship and crew. The crew, composed of oceanographic scientists, took a rather dim view of Orca's mercenary intent and was constantly trying to break out of the charter to wander off and examine black smokers and other exotic underwater sites in the mid-Atlantic.
The author deliberately focuses on the personalities and the human conflicts and cultural clashes between crew and expedition, rather than the technological details of the search. This may be because ultimately, the search turned out to be rather disappointing. (A separate American expedition found one of the targets after Orca had given up on it, although as of 1999 it had not recovered any gold.) While the portrayals are for the most part sympathetic, the expedition members come off as rather flawed, as does the chief Russian scientist.
The laidback tone of the book is occasionally interupted when the author feels an abrupt and jarring need to wax literary and to proffer untranslated epigrams in foreign languages as proof of his sophistication. He also gets a little too impressed with his fabulous globe-trotting adventures and general wonderfulness.
Those flaws aside, however, the book shows a side of salvage expeditions that is not often seen, and provides some details on the little-known Italian submarine campaigns of the war. For those who enjoy reading about the discovery of sunken wrecks, this would be an acceptable choice.
Oh, by the way, the Keldysh remains active to this day, although it seems to be devoting more of its time to money-making tourist charters for dives on famous wrecks rather than pure science. Somewhere, the author of this book is weeping.
Great storytelling about the search for gold on sunken sub